2008-10-08 00:08 pranith, I see the same valgrind issues 2008-10-08 00:10 yeah i noticed those too 2008-10-08 00:11 what is the actual bug? 2008-10-08 00:12 good question 2008-10-08 00:12 I see the very first valgrind complaint does not really matter, it is assigning an invalid groups pointer, but that pointer will be ignored because the code relies on knowing groups = 0 there, and should not use the groups pointer in that case 2008-10-08 00:12 the group pointer I meant 2008-10-08 00:13 I mean, what is the symptom? Just that make tests stops there? 2008-10-08 00:14 the next interesting valgrind complaint at line 419 is just a printf 2008-10-08 00:17 the issue at 469 is, I didn't set dleaf->free or ->used at the end of the leaf packing operations 2008-10-08 00:18 dleaf_dump is complaining about an unitialized count field, which sounds bad but the leaf seems perfectly ok when printed out 2008-10-08 00:19 and there is a leak of 1K in the test 2008-10-08 00:19 shapor, that should be enough for you to kill the all off 2008-10-08 00:20 the first one above can be fixed by not doing the two offending assignments if leaf->groups is zero 2008-10-08 00:21 or maybe better, assigning the two pointers in the struct dwalk to NULL 2008-10-08 00:31 I won't be able to fix these for another couple days, anybody else is welcome 2008-10-08 00:43 flipz: no its not copying the pointer at 641 2008-10-08 00:43 the first error is a problem 2008-10-08 00:48 flipz, is the leak genuine? 2008-10-08 00:48 don't know 2008-10-08 00:48 try putting in exit(1) instead of return 2008-10-08 00:53 shapor, walk->group at 641 is valid but *walk->group is not 2008-10-08 00:54 so right, the pointer is fine, it's the object that's invalid 2008-10-08 00:55 ACTION goes for some zzzs 2008-10-08 01:14 flipzzz: http://arstechnica.com/journals/linux.ars/2008/10/07/wizbit-a-linux-filesystem-with-distributed-version-control 2008-10-08 01:14 very interesting 2008-10-08 01:27 wow shiny 2008-10-08 01:28 uses gnome vfs I think I saw 2008-10-08 01:35 yeah 2008-10-08 01:44 ok really sleeping this time 2008-10-08 02:42 -!- less(~less@145-116-238-192.uilenstede.casema.nl) has joined #tux3 2008-10-08 05:05 -!- tim_dimm(~timothyhu@cpe-76-90-98-247.socal.res.rr.com) has joined #tux3 2008-10-08 05:10 hey tim_dimm 2008-10-08 05:10 hey pranith 2008-10-08 05:10 i'm up feeding my twins 2008-10-08 05:10 oh, i thought u had a girl 2008-10-08 05:10 lucky u 2008-10-08 05:10 boy and a girl 2008-10-08 05:11 cool 2008-10-08 05:12 how old? 2008-10-08 05:12 4 weeks 2008-10-08 05:12 quite a handful 2008-10-08 05:13 oh, cool 2008-10-08 05:42 -!- pgquiles(~pgquiles@166.Red-88-16-39.dynamicIP.rima-tde.net) has joined #tux3 2008-10-08 07:06 -!- kbingham(~kbingham@cvs.mpc-ogw.co.uk) has joined #tux3 2008-10-08 08:39 -!- Kirantpatil(~kiran@122.167.197.37) has joined #tux3 2008-10-08 08:39 -!- Kirantpatil(~kiran@122.167.197.37) has left #tux3 2008-10-08 08:42 -!- tim_dimm(~timothyhu@cpe-76-90-98-247.socal.res.rr.com) has joined #tux3 2008-10-08 10:27 hey all 2008-10-08 11:27 -!- daniel_(~daniel@d75-157-56-124.bchsia.telus.net) has joined #tux3 2008-10-08 13:38 folks 2008-10-08 13:59 the mails about encoding of extent information: To me, it sounds like a variant of a buddy-system 2008-10-08 14:40 what's that ? 2008-10-08 15:08 data, right, and he mentions knuth too 2008-10-08 15:09 but it is an original application 2008-10-08 15:10 question is: is the per pointer bit saving more than the extra pointers required? 2008-10-08 15:10 It is quite possible that it is 2008-10-08 15:10 need to spreadsheet that 2008-10-08 15:26 worth giving it a shot anyway 2008-10-08 15:26 g'night 2008-10-08 15:47 -!- tim_dimm(~timothyhu@cpe-76-90-98-247.socal.res.rr.com) has joined #tux3 2008-10-08 17:59 -!- ajonat(~ajonat@190.48.94.249) has joined #tux3 2008-10-08 18:36 -!- tim_dimm(~timothyhu@cpe-76-90-98-247.socal.res.rr.com) has joined #tux3 2008-10-08 18:51 -!- tim_dimm(~timothyhu@cpe-76-90-98-247.socal.res.rr.com) has joined #tux3 2008-10-08 20:03 -!- Kirantpatil(~kiran@122.167.211.254) has joined #tux3 2008-10-08 21:20 -!- natalie(~natalie@72.14.228.1) has joined #tux3 2008-10-08 21:34 -!- natalie(~natalie@72.14.228.1) has left #tux3 2008-10-08 21:35 -!- Kirantpatil(~kiran@122.167.192.198) has joined #tux3 2008-10-08 21:35 -!- Kirantpatil(~kiran@122.167.192.198) has left #tux3 2008-10-08 22:25 -!- FelipeS(~Felipe@r77h15.res.gatech.edu) has joined #tux3 2008-10-08 23:21 -!- tim_dimm(~timothyhu@cpe-76-90-98-247.socal.res.rr.com) has joined #tux3 2008-10-08 23:32 -!- tim_dimm(~timothyhu@cpe-76-90-98-247.socal.res.rr.com) has joined #tux3 2008-10-08 23:53 -!- pranith(~Bobby@122.162.67.161) has joined #tux3 2008-10-08 23:53 hey all